How to Read Valve Symbols on P&IDs — Part 6: Valve Tags, Instrument Bubbles & Control Loops

P&ID training chart explaining valve tags, instrument bubbles, signal lines, loop numbers, and flow, pressure, and level control loops.
In this article
  1. FIC-101
  2. FT — Flow Transmitter
  3. FI — Flow Indicator
  4. FIC — Flow Indicating Controller
  5. FV — Flow Valve
  6. PT — Pressure Transmitter
  7. PI — Pressure Indicator
  8. PIC — Pressure Indicating Controller
  9. PV — Pressure Valve
  10. TT — Temperature Transmitter
  11. TI — Temperature Indicator
  12. TIC — Temperature Indicating Controller
  13. TV — Temperature Valve
  14. LT — Level Transmitter
  15. LI — Level Indicator
  16. LIC — Level Indicating Controller
  17. LV — Level Valve
  18. 101
  19. Always check the project legend.
  20. FT-101 → FIC-101 → FV-101
  21. FT-101
  22. FIC-101
  23. FV-101
  24. FT-101
  25. Control Loop
  26. MEASURE
  27. COMPARE
  28. ACT
  29. MEASURE AGAIN
  30. PT-201
  31. PIC-201
  32. PV-201
  33. How are they connected?
  34. Final Control Element
  35. LV-305
  36. 1. Find the process variable.
  37. 2. Find the measuring device.
  38. 3. Follow the signal.
  39. 4. Find the controller.
  40. 5. Follow the controller output.
  41. 6. Find the final control element.
  42. 7. Look for accessories.
  43. 8. Look for alarms and switches.
  44. 9. Check the loop number.
  45. 10. Check the project legend.
  46. How to Read Valve Symbols on P&IDs — Part 7: Normally Open, Normally Closed & Fail Positions
  47. What makes it close—and what happens if that control disappears.

There comes a point when reading a P&ID where identifying the valve itself is no longer the hard part.

You recognize the valve. You know which direction the process flows. You can tell whether it has an actuator.

Then you notice circles labeled FT-101, FIC-101, PT-202, LSHH-301 and dashed lines running everywhere.

That’s when many beginners get lost.

Those circles aren’t clutter. They’re telling you what the plant is measuring, what decisions the control system is making, and what equipment responds to those decisions.

Once you understand the language of instrument tags and control loops, a P&ID starts behaving less like a drawing and more like a story.


Where We Are in the Series

So far we’ve built the foundation step by step:

Part 1 — Valve Symbol Fundamentals

Part 2 — Gate, Globe, Ball, Butterfly & Other Manual Valves

Part 3 — Check Valves & Flow Direction

Part 4 — Control Valves & Actuators

Part 5 — Relief, Safety & Special Valves

Now we’re going to connect those valves to the instruments controlling the process.


What Is an Instrument Tag?

Consider:

FIC-101

Don’t memorize that as one word.

Break it apart.

F — Flow

I — Indicating

C — Controller

101 — Loop identification number

So:

FIC-101 = Flow Indicating Controller associated with loop 101

That’s the basic method you’ll use throughout this chapter.

Read the letters from left to right and determine what each one is telling you.


The First Letter: What Are We Measuring?

Under commonly used instrumentation conventions, the first letter identifies the measured or initiating variable.

Some of the most common are:

F — Flow

P — Pressure

T — Temperature

L — Level

A — Analysis

There are many others.

But if you’re learning P&IDs, those four alone will let you understand a large number of everyday process loops.

For example:

FT

starts with F.

You’re dealing with flow.

PT

starts with P.

You’re dealing with pressure.

TT

starts with T.

You’re dealing with temperature.

LT

starts with L.

You’re dealing with level.


The Following Letters: What Does the Device Do?

After the first letter establishes the process variable, additional letters describe the instrument’s function.

Common examples include:

I — Indicating

C — Controller

T — Transmitter

S — Switch

A — Alarm

R — Recorder

V — Valve / final control element in common loop notation

These combinations create the tags you see across P&IDs.


Common Instrument Tags

Let’s put the pieces together.

FT — Flow Transmitter

Measures flow and transmits that information.

FI — Flow Indicator

Displays flow.

FIC — Flow Indicating Controller

Indicates flow and performs a control function.

FV — Flow Valve

The final control element associated with a flow loop under a common tagging convention.


PT — Pressure Transmitter

Measures pressure and transmits the measurement.

PI — Pressure Indicator

Displays pressure.

PIC — Pressure Indicating Controller

Indicates and controls pressure.

PV — Pressure Valve

A final control element associated with pressure control.


TT — Temperature Transmitter

Measures temperature and transmits the signal.

TI — Temperature Indicator

Displays temperature.

TIC — Temperature Indicating Controller

Indicates and controls temperature.

TV — Temperature Valve

A final control element associated with a temperature loop.


LT — Level Transmitter

Measures level.

LI — Level Indicator

Displays level.

LIC — Level Indicating Controller

Indicates and controls level.

LV — Level Valve

A final control element associated with level control.


The Loop Number

Now consider:

FT-101

FIC-101

FV-101

Notice anything?

They all contain:

101

That’s because they’re associated with the same control loop under the project’s numbering system.

Think of the number as the loop’s family name.

FT-101 measures the process variable.

FIC-101 controls it.

FV-101 changes the process.

The shared loop number helps you recognize that these devices belong together.


Loop Numbers Are Not Equipment Numbers

Don’t automatically assume loop numbering follows the same system as equipment numbering.

You might have:

P-101

and:

FT-101

That doesn’t necessarily mean the transmitter belongs specifically to Pump 101 just because both contain 101.

The project may use entirely separate numbering conventions.

Always understand the facility’s tagging system before drawing conclusions from matching numbers.


What Is an Instrument Bubble?

Instrument functions are commonly represented using circular symbols often called:

Instrument bubbles

or:

Instrument balloons

Inside the bubble you’ll see the tag.

For example:

FT
101

The letters tell you the instrument function.

The number identifies the loop according to the project convention.

But the appearance of the bubble can communicate additional information.


Bubble Lines Can Indicate Location

Depending on the drawing standard, different bubble configurations may indicate whether an instrument or function is:

Field mounted

Located on a main control panel

Located behind a panel

Accessible to the operator

Implemented in a control system

or otherwise located or represented.

For example, a simple circle may commonly indicate a field-mounted instrument, while lines through the circle can indicate panel or control-room location under certain conventions.

But this is exactly where memorization can cause problems.

Always check the project legend.

Symbol conventions can vary between companies and generations of drawings.


The Basic Flow-Control Loop

Let’s build a complete loop.

Suppose process fluid flows through a pipe and the plant needs to maintain:

500 gallons per minute.

The loop might appear conceptually as:

FT-101 → FIC-101 → FV-101

FT-101

Measures actual process flow.

Suppose it measures:

450 GPM

It transmits that information.

↓

FIC-101

Receives the measured flow.

The desired setpoint is:

500 GPM

The controller recognizes that actual flow is below the desired value.

It calculates an output.

↓

FV-101

Receives the control command.

The actuator changes valve position.

Flow increases.

↓

FT-101

Measures the new flow.

The cycle repeats continuously.

That is why it’s called a:

Control Loop

The measurement comes back around and influences the next control action.


Measure → Compare → Act → Measure Again

This pattern is one of the most useful concepts you can learn:

MEASURE

The transmitter determines what the process is actually doing.

↓

COMPARE

The controller compares the measured condition with the desired condition.

↓

ACT

The final control element changes the process.

↓

MEASURE AGAIN

The transmitter detects the result.

That basic idea applies to far more than flow.


Pressure Control Loop

Consider:

PT-201 → PIC-201 → PV-201

PT-201

Measures process pressure.

PIC-201

Compares actual pressure with the desired pressure.

PV-201

Changes position to influence pressure.

Same logic.

Different process variable.


Level Control Loop

Now imagine a vessel.

LT-301 → LIC-301 → LV-301

LT-301 measures the liquid level.

LIC-301 compares that level with its setpoint.

LV-301 adjusts a process flow to influence vessel level.

The control valve could be located on:

The inlet

or:

The outlet

depending on the process design.

That distinction matters.

Don’t assume every level-control valve works the same way.


Temperature Control Loop

Consider a heat exchanger.

The process needs to leave the exchanger at a certain temperature.

You might encounter:

TT-401 → TIC-401 → TV-401

TT-401 measures temperature.

TIC-401 evaluates the measurement.

TV-401 changes the flow of a heating or cooling medium.

For example, the valve might regulate:

Steam

Cooling water

Hot oil

Refrigerant

or another utility.

Again:

Measure → Compare → Act


Switches Are Different From Transmitters

This distinction is important.

A transmitter continuously communicates a measured variable over its designed range.

A switch typically changes state when a defined condition is reached.

Consider:

PSH-101

This may represent:

Pressure Switch High

When pressure reaches a specified high condition, the switch changes state.

You might also encounter:

PSL — Pressure Switch Low

LSH — Level Switch High

LSL — Level Switch Low

TSH — Temperature Switch High

depending on project conventions.


What Does HH Mean?

You may encounter tags such as:

LSHH

or:

PSHH

The additional letters can indicate more severe alarm or trip levels under a project’s convention.

For example:

LSH — Level Switch High

LSHH — Level Switch High-High

A high-high level condition might initiate something more serious than an ordinary high-level alarm.

It could potentially trigger:

Pump shutdown

Valve closure

Emergency action

or another protective response.

But the P&ID alone may not fully define that action.

For that, you may need the:

Cause-and-effect diagram

Logic diagram

Control narrative

or:

Safety instrumented system documentation


Alarm Tags

You may also see alarms represented within instrument identification.

For example:

PAH — Pressure Alarm High

PAL — Pressure Alarm Low

LAH — Level Alarm High

LAL — Level Alarm Low

TAH — Temperature Alarm High

The exact combinations depend on the project’s convention.

The important thing is learning to break the tag apart.

Take:

LAHH-301

Instead of memorizing it, read it:

L — Level

A — Alarm

HH — High-High

301 — Loop identification

Now the tag tells a story.


Signal Lines

The lines connecting instrument bubbles are just as important as the bubbles themselves.

Different line styles can represent different signal types.

Depending on the drawing legend, they may indicate:

Pneumatic

Electrical

Hydraulic

Data / digital

Capillary

Mechanical

or other connections.

This means you shouldn’t simply see:

FT-101 –––– FIC-101

and think:

“Those are connected.”

Ask:

How are they connected?

Is the signal pneumatic?

Electrical?

Digital?

That can tell you considerably more about the control system.


Why Older P&IDs Can Look Different

Industrial facilities can remain in service for decades.

A refinery may contain P&IDs originally drafted in:

1975

modified in:

1998

converted to CAD in:

2007

and revised again today.

Older instrumentation systems may have relied heavily on pneumatic control.

Modern systems may use:

DCS

PLC

digital communication

smart transmitters

and other technologies.

The P&ID symbology may reflect some of that history.

This is another reason the project legend is so important.


DCS — Distributed Control System

Many modern process plants use a:

DCS — Distributed Control System

The DCS receives process measurements, executes control functions, displays information to operators and sends commands to final control elements.

In our flow-control example:

FT-101

may transmit its measurement into the DCS.

The:

FIC-101

control function may exist inside the DCS rather than as a physical standalone controller mounted on a wall.

The DCS then sends an output toward:

FV-101.

So when you see a controller bubble on a P&ID, don’t automatically imagine a separate physical box.

The function may be implemented electronically within a larger control system.


PLC — Programmable Logic Controller

You may also encounter:

PLC — Programmable Logic Controller

PLCs are widely used for:

Equipment control

Sequences

Interlocks

Machine control

Shutdown functions

and many other industrial applications.

A P&ID may show signals entering or leaving a PLC-controlled system.

Again, the drawing shows the functional relationship.

Detailed programming logic normally lives elsewhere.


The Final Control Element

We’ve used this phrase several times.

A:

Final Control Element

is the device that physically changes the process in response to the controller’s output.

Often that’s a:

Control valve.

But it doesn’t have to be.

Other final control elements can include:

Variable-speed drives

Dampers

Heaters

Pumps

or other devices.

In this valve series, we’re primarily concerned with the valve.

So when you see:

FV-101

think:

This is where the control loop physically changes the process flow.


Valve Positioners in the Loop

Part 4 introduced the valve positioner.

Now let’s place it into the control-loop story.

Imagine:

FIC-101 → Positioner → FV-101

The controller requests a valve position.

The positioner helps move the actuator so the valve reaches the commanded position.

It can also use valve-position feedback to improve accuracy.

The positioner essentially helps translate the control command into actual valve movement.


I/P Transducers

Suppose the controller sends:

4–20 mA

but the pneumatic actuator system requires an air-pressure signal.

An:

I/P transducer

can convert:

Electrical current

into:

Pneumatic pressure

A simplified sequence might be:

FIC-101

↓

4–20 mA

↓

I/P

↓

Pneumatic signal

↓

Positioner

↓

Actuator

↓

FV-101

When you understand that chain, the small symbols surrounding a control valve suddenly make sense.


Solenoid Valves in Shutdown Loops

A solenoid valve may be used to control instrument air to an actuator.

For example:

Emergency shutdown signal

↓

Solenoid changes state

↓

Instrument air is vented

↓

Spring-return actuator moves

↓

ESDV closes

Now connect this with Part 5’s discussion of emergency shutdown valves.

The ESDV isn’t acting by magic.

There is a signal path and an energy path causing that valve to move.

That’s what you want to learn to see on the P&ID.


Control Loop vs. Safety Function

Not every instrument loop exists for routine process control.

Compare:

PT → PIC → PV

with:

PSHH → ESD system → ESDV

The first may continuously control pressure.

The second may act only when pressure reaches a dangerous high-high condition.

One manages normal operation.

The other protects against an abnormal condition.

Understanding the difference is essential.


Follow the Loop Backward

Here’s one of the best tricks for reading unfamiliar P&IDs.

Start at the control valve.

Suppose you find:

LV-305

Now follow its signal line backward.

What controls LV-305?

You find:

LIC-305

Now continue backward.

What provides the measurement?

LT-305

Now you know:

LT-305 → LIC-305 → LV-305

It’s a level-control loop.

You didn’t need to understand the entire drawing.

You simply followed the signal.


Follow the Loop Forward

You can also work in the opposite direction.

Suppose you find:

PT-402

Ask:

Where does its signal go?

It goes to:

PIC-402

Then:

Where does the controller output go?

It goes to:

PV-402

You just discovered a pressure-control loop.

This forward/backward tracing method works extremely well on complicated drawings.


A Complete Example

Imagine a vessel:

V-501

The P&ID shows:

LT-501 → LIC-501 → LV-501

and:

PT-502 → PIC-502 → PV-502

and:

LSHH-503 → ESD

Now read the process.

The vessel has a continuous level measurement and level-control loop.

It also has pressure measurement and pressure control.

Separately, a high-high level condition participates in a protective function.

Three different instrumentation functions.

One piece of equipment.

That’s how real P&IDs start becoming dense.

But once you separate the loops, they’re much easier to understand.


Instrument Loops Around Pumps

Suppose a pump has:

P-101

with:

PSL-101

on its suction.

That low-pressure switch might be associated with an alarm, trip or permissive depending on the system design.

You might also see:

PI-102

on the discharge.

That may simply provide pressure indication.

The presence of an instrument doesn’t automatically mean it controls something.

Ask:

Is this measurement?

Indication?

Alarm?

Control?

Trip?

The letters and signal connections help answer that.


Instruments Around Tanks

A storage tank might have:

LI — Level Indicator

LAH — Level Alarm High

LAL — Level Alarm Low

LSHH — Level Switch High-High

LT — Level Transmitter

Each serves a different purpose.

The transmitter may provide continuous level measurement.

The indicator displays the measurement.

The alarms alert operators.

The high-high switch may participate in a protective action.

Same process variable.

Different functions.


Don’t Assume the P&ID Shows Every Detail

The P&ID shows the functional relationship between instruments and equipment.

But detailed information may live in:

Instrument index

Instrument data sheets

Loop diagrams

Wiring diagrams

Cause-and-effect diagrams

Logic diagrams

Control narratives

I/O lists

Cable schedules

Vendor drawings

A P&ID tells you:

What interacts with what.

A loop diagram may tell you exactly:

How the devices are wired or connected.

Understanding the difference prevents you from expecting one drawing to contain everything.


How to Read Any Control Loop

Use this method:

1. Find the process variable.

Flow?

Pressure?

Temperature?

Level?

2. Find the measuring device.

FT?

PT?

TT?

LT?

3. Follow the signal.

Where does the measurement go?

4. Find the controller.

FIC?

PIC?

TIC?

LIC?

5. Follow the controller output.

Where does the command go?

6. Find the final control element.

FV?

PV?

TV?

LV?

7. Look for accessories.

I/P?

Positioner?

Solenoid?

Limit switch?

8. Look for alarms and switches.

High?

Low?

High-high?

Low-low?

9. Check the loop number.

Which instruments belong together?

10. Check the project legend.

Always verify project-specific symbology and abbreviations.


Don’t Memorize Tags — Decode Them

This is the central lesson from Part 6.

When you encounter:

PIC-204

don’t memorize PIC-204.

Decode it.

P = Pressure

I = Indicating

C = Controller

204 = Loop identification

When you encounter:

LSHH-307

decode it.

L = Level

S = Switch

HH = High-High

307 = Loop identification

Once you learn the language, unfamiliar tags become readable.


Series Progress

We now have:

Part 1 — Valve Symbol Fundamentals

Part 2 — Gate, Globe, Ball, Butterfly & Other Manual Valves

Part 3 — Check Valves & Flow Direction

Part 4 — Control Valves & Actuators

Part 5 — Relief, Safety & Special Valves

Part 6 — Valve Tags, Instrument Bubbles & Control Loops

We’re almost ready to put everything together.

But first, we need to address one of the most commonly misunderstood areas of valve symbology:

Normal position versus failure position.


Coming Next

How to Read Valve Symbols on P&IDs — Part 7: Normally Open, Normally Closed & Fail Positions

Part 7 will break down:

NO — Normally Open

NC — Normally Closed

FO — Fail Open

FC — Fail Closed

FL — Fail Last / Fail Locked

and the critical difference between where a valve normally operates and where it goes when its operating energy disappears.

We’ll also work through real process examples involving fuel gas, cooling water, steam, emergency shutdown valves and bypass arrangements so you can understand why engineers intentionally choose different failure positions.

Because when you’re reading a P&ID, knowing that a valve closes isn’t enough.

You need to know:

What makes it close—and what happens if that control disappears.

Share by email